digital-obesity-Gerd-Leonhard-Futurist-Technology-Humanity.007

HumanEvolution1

Our Evolution

More: evolution-transhumanism-and-the-trend-of-modern-evolution

The Six Epoches of Evolution

transhumanism-epochs-white

More: Transhumanism

More: the-next-stage-in-our-evolution

WHAT IS TRANSHUMANISM?

digital-obesity-Gerd-Leonhard-Futurist-Technology-Humanity.007

Nick Bostrom
(Original version appeared in 1998, here slightly revised and with a postscript added in 2001)

Over the past few years, a new paradigm for thinking about humankind’s future has begun to take shape among some leading computer scientists, neuroscientists, nanotechnologists and researchers at the forefront of technological development. The new paradigm rejects a crucial assumption that is implicit in both traditional futurology and practically all of today’s political thinking. This is the assumption that the “human condition” is at root a constant. Present-day processes can be fine-tuned; wealth can be increased and redistributed; tools can be developed and refined; culture can change, sometimes drastically; but human nature itself is not up for grabs.
This assumption no longer holds true. Arguably it has never been true. Such innovations as speech, written language, printing, engines, modern medicine and computers have had a profound impact not just on how people live their lives, but on who and what they are. Compared to what might happen in the next few decades, these changes may have been slow and even relatively tame. But note that even a single additional innovation as important as any of the above would be enough to invalidate orthodox projections of the future of our world.
“Transhumanism” has gained currency as the name for a new way of thinking that challenges the premise that the human condition is and will remain essentially unalterable. Clearing away that mental block allows one to see a dazzling landscape of radical possibilities, ranging from unlimited bliss to the extinction of intelligent life. In general, the future by present lights looks very weird – but perhaps very wonderful – indeed.
Some of the possibilities that you will no doubt hear discussed in the coming years are quite extreme and sound like science-fiction. Consider the following:
Superintelligent machines. Superintelligence means any form of artificial intelligence, maybe inspired by a better understanding of the computational architectures and learning algorithms used by human brains, that is capable of outclassing the best human brains in practically every discipline, including scientific creativity, practical wisdom, and social skills. Several commentators have argued that both the hardware and the software required for superintelligence might be developed within a few decades.

Lifelong emotional well-being through re-calibration of the pleasure-centers. Even today, mild variants of sustainable euphoria are possible for a minority of people who respond especially well to clinical mood-brighteners (“antidepressants”). Pharmaceuticals currently under development promise to give an increasing number of “normal” people the choice of drastically reducing the incidence of negative emotions in their lives. In some cases, the adverse side-effects of the new agents are negligible. Whereas street drugs typically wreak havoc on the brain’s neurochemistry, producing a brief emotional “high” followed by a crash, modern clinical drugs may target with high specificity a given neurotransmitter or receptor subtype, thereby avoiding any negative effect on the subject’s cognitive faculties – (s)he won’t feel “drugged” – and enables a constant, indefinitely sustainable mood-elevation without being addictive. David Pearce advocates and predicts a post-Darwinian era in which all aversive experience will be replaced by gradients of pleasure beyond the bounds of normal human experience. As cleaner and safer mood-brighteners and gene-therapies become available, “paradise-engineering” may become a practicable possibility.

Personality pills. Drugs and gene therapy will yield far more than shallow one-dimensional pleasure. They can also modify personality. They can help overcome shyness, eliminate jealousy, increase creativity and enhance the capacity for empathy and emotional depth. Think of all the preaching, fasting and self-discipline that people have subjected themselves to throughout the ages in attempts to ennoble their character. Shortly it may become possible to achieve the same goals much more thoroughly by swallowing a daily cocktail pill.

Space colonization. Today, space colonization is technologically feasible but prohibitively expensive. As costs decrease, it will become economically and politically possible to begin to colonize space. The thing to note is that once a single self-sustaining colony has been established, capable of sending out its own colonization probes, then an exponentially self-replicating process has been set in motion that is capable – without any further input from the planet Earth – of spreading out across the millions of stars in our galaxy and then to millions of other galaxies as well. Of course, this sequence of events will take an extremely long time on a human time-scale. But it is interesting to notice how near we are to being able to initiate a chain of events that will have such momentous consequences as filling the observable universe with our descendants.

Molecular nanotechnology. Nanotechnology is the hypothetical design and manufacture of machines to atomic-scale precision, including general-purpose “assemblers”, devices that can position atoms individually in order to build almost any chemically permitted matter-configuration for which we can give a detailed specification – including exact copies of themselves. An existence-proof of a limited form of nanotechnology is given by biology: the cell is a molecular self-replicator that can produce a broad range of proteins. But the part of design space that is accessible to present biological organisms is restricted by their evolutionary history, and is mostly confined to non-rigid carbon structures. Eric Drexler was the first person to analyze in detail the physical possibility of a practically universal molecular assembler. Once such a gadget exists, it would make possible dirt-cheap (but perfectly clean) production of almost any commodity, given a design-specification and the requisite input of energy and atoms. The bootstrap problem for nanotechnology – how to build this first assembler – is very hard to solve. Two approaches are currently pursued. One of them builds on what nature has achieved and seeks to use biochemistry to engineer new proteins that can serve as tools in further engineering efforts. The other attempts to build atomic structures from scratch, using proximal probes such as atomic-force microscopes to position atoms one-by-one on a surface. The two methods can potentially be used in conjunction. Much research is required before the physical possibility of Drexlerian nanotechnology can be turned into an actuality; it will certainly not happen in the next couple of years, but it might come about in the first few decades of the 21st century.

Vastly extended life spans. It may prove feasible to use radical gene-therapy and other biological methods to block normal aging processes, and to stimulate rejuvenation and repair mechanisms indefinitely. It is also possible that nothing short of nanotechnology will do the trick. Meanwhile there are unproven and in some cases expensive hormone treatments that seem to have some effect on general vitality in elderly people, although as yet nothing has been shown to be more effective at life-extension than controlled caloric restriction.

Extinction of intelligent life. The risks are as enormous as the potential benefits. In addition to dangers that are already recognized (though perhaps inadequately counteracted?), such as a major military, terrorist or accidental disaster involving nuclear, chemical, viral or bacteriological agents, the new technologies threaten dangers of a different order altogether. Nanotechnology, for example, could pose a terrible threat to our existence if obtained by some terrorist group before adequate defense systems have been developed. It is not even certain that adequate defense is possible. Perhaps in a nanotechnological world offense has a decisive intrinsic advantage over defense. Nor is it farfetched to assume that there are other risks that we haven’t yet been able to imagine.

The interconnected world. Even in its present form, the Internet has an immense impact on some people’s lives. And its ramifications are just beginning to unfold. This is one area where radical change is quite widely perceived, and where media discussion has been extensive.

Uploading of our consciousness into a virtual reality. If we could scan the synaptic matrix of a human brain and simulate it on a computer then it would be possible for us to migrate from our biological embodiments to a purely digital substrate (given certain philosophical assumptions about the nature of consciousness and personal identity). By making sure we always had back-up copies, we might then enjoy effectively unlimited life-spans. By directing the activation flow in the simulated neural networks, we could engineer totally new types of experience. Uploading, in this sense, would probably require mature nanotechnology. But there are less extreme ways of fusing the human mind with computers. Work is being done today on developing neuro/chip interfaces. The technology is still in its early stages; but it might one day enable us to build neuroprostheses whereby we could “plug in” to cyberspace. Even less speculative are various schemes for immersive virtual reality — for instance, using head-mounted displays that communicate with the brain via our natural sense organs.

Reanimation of cryonics patients. Persons frozen with today’s procedure can probably not be brought back to life with anything less than mature nanotechnology. Even if we could be absolutely sure that mature nanotechnology will one day be developed, there would still be no guarantee that the cryonics customer’s gamble would succeed — perhaps the beings of the future won’t be interested in reanimating present-day humans. Still, even a 5% or 10% chance of success could make cryonics contracts a rational option for people who can afford it and who place a great value on their continued personal existence. If reanimated, they might look forward to aeons of subjective life time under conditions of their own choosing.
These prospects might seem remote. Yet transhumanists think there is reason to believe that they might not be so far off as is commonly supposed. The Technology Postulate denotes the hypothesis that several of the items listed, or other changes that are equally profound, will become feasible within, say, seventy years (possibly much sooner). This is the antithesis of the assumption that the human condition is a constant. The Technology Postulate is often presupposed in transhumanist discussion. But it is not an article of blind faith; it’s a falsifiable hypothesis that is argued for on specific scientific and technological grounds.
If we come to believe that there are good grounds for believing that the Technology Postulate is true, what consequences does that have for how we perceive the world and for how we spend our time? Once we start reflecting on the matter and become aware of its ramifications, the implications are profound.
From this awareness springs the transhumanist philosophy — and “movement”. For transhumanism is more than just an abstract belief that we are about to transcend our biological limitations by means of technology; it is also an attempt to re-evaluate the entire human predicament as traditionally conceived. And it is a bid to take a far-sighted and constructive approach to our new situation. A primary task is to provoke the widest possible discussion of these topics and to promote a better public understanding. The set of skills and competencies that are needed to drive the transhumanist agenda extend far beyond those of computer scientists, neuroscientists, software-designers and other high-tech gurus. Transhumanism is not just for brains accustomed to hard-core futurism. It should be a concern for our whole society.
It is extremely hard to anticipate the long-term consequences of our present actions. But rather than sticking our heads in the sand, transhumanists reckon we should at least try to plan for them as best we can. In doing so, it becomes necessary to confront some of the notorious “big questions” about the structure of the world and the role and prospects of sentience within it. Doing so requires delving into a number of different scientific disciplines as well as tackling hard philosophical problems.
While the wider perspective and the bigger questions are essential to transhumanism, that does not mean that transhumanists do not take an intense interest in what goes in our world today. On the contrary! Recent topical themes that have been the subject of wide and lively debate in transhumanist forums include such diverse issues as cloning; proliferation of weapons of mass-destruction; neuro/chip interfaces; psychological tools such as critical thinking skills, NLP, and memetics; processor technology and Moore’s law; gender roles and sexuality; neural networks and neuromorphic engineering; life-extension techniques such as caloric restriction; PET, MRI and other brain-scanning methods; evidence (?) for life on Mars; transhumanist fiction and films; quantum cryptography and “teleportation”; the Digital Citizen; atomic force microscopy as a possible enabling technology for nanotechnology; electronic commerce…. Not all participants are equally at home in all of these fields, of course, but many like the experience of taking part in a joint exploration of unfamiliar ideas, facts and standpoints.
An important transhumanist goal is to improve the functioning of human society as an epistemic community. In addition to trying to figure out what is happening, we can try to figure out ways of making ourselves better at figuring out what is happening. We can create institutions that increase the efficiency of the academic- and other knowledge-communities. More and more people are gaining access to the Internet. Programmers, software designers, IT consultants and others are involved in projects that are constantly increasing the quality and quantity of advantages of being connected. Hypertext publishing and the collaborative information filtering paradigm have the potential to accelerate the propagation of valuable information and aid the demolition of what transpire to be misconceptions and crackpot claims. The people working in information technology are only the latest reinforcement to the body of educators, scientists, humanists, teachers and responsible journalists who have been striving throughout the ages to decrease ignorance and make humankind as a whole more rational.
One simple but brilliant idea, developed by Robin Hanson, is that we create a market of “idea futures”. Basically, this means that it would be possible to place bets on all sorts of claims about controversial scientific and technological issues. One of the many benefits of such an institution is that it would provide policy-makers and others with consensus estimates of the probabilities of uncertain hypotheses about projected future events, such as when a certain technological breakthrough will occur. It would also offer a decentralized way of providing financial incentives for people to make an effort to be right in what they think. And it could promote intellectual sincerity in that persons making strong claims would be encouraged to put their money where their mouth is. At present, the idea is embodied in an experimental set-up, the Foresight Exchange, where people can stake “credibility points” on a variety of claims. But for its potential advantages to materialize, a market has to be created that deals in real money and is as integrated in the established economic structure as are current stock exchanges. (Present anti-gambling regulations are one impediment to this; in many countries betting on anything other than sport and horses is prohibited.)
The transhumanist outlook can appear cold and alien at first. Many people are frightened by the rapid changes they are witnessing and respond with denial or by calling for bans on new technologies. It’s worth recalling how pain relief at childbirth through the use of anesthetics was once deplored as unnatural. More recently, the idea of “test-tube babies” has been viewed with abhorrence. Genetic engineering is widely seen as interfering with God’s designs. Right now, the biggest moral panic is cloning. We have today a whole breed of well-meaning biofundamentalists, religious leaders and so-called ethical experts who see it as their duty to protect us from whatever “unnatural” possibilities that don’t fit into their preconceived world-view. The transhumanist philosophy is a positive alternative to this ban-the-new approach to coping with a changing world. Instead of rejecting the unprecedented opportunities on offer, it invites us to embrace them as vigorously as we can. Transhumanists view technological progress as a joint human effort to invent new tools that we can use to reshape the human condition and overcome our biological limitations, making it possible for those who so want to become “post-humans”. Whether the tools are “natural” or “unnatural” is entirely irrelevant.
Transhumanism is not a philosophy with a fixed set of dogmas. What distinguishes transhumanists, in addition to their broadly technophiliac values, is the sort of problems they explore. These include subject matter as far-reaching as the future of intelligent life, as well as much more narrow questions about present-day scientific, technological or social developments. In addressing these problems, transhumanists aim to take a fact-driven, scientific, problem-solving approach. They also make a point of challenging holy cows and questioning purported impossibilities. No principle is beyond doubt, not the necessity of death, not our confinement to the finite resources of planet Earth, not even transhumanism itself is held to be too good for constant critical reassessment. The ideology is meant to evolve and be reshaped as we move along, in response to new experiences and new challenges. Transhumanists are prepared to be shown wrong and to learn from their mistakes.
Transhumanism can also be very practical and down-to-earth. Many transhumanists find ways of applying their philosophy to their own lives, ranging from the use of diet and exercise to improve health and life-expectancy; to signing up for cryonic suspension; creating transhumanist art; using clinical drugs to adjust parameters of mood and personality; applying various psychological self-improvement techniques; and in general taking steps to live richer and more responsible lives. An empowering mind-set that is common among transhumanists is dynamic optimism: the attitude that desirable results can in general be accomplished, but only through hard effort and smart choices.
Are you a transhumanist? If so, then you can look forward to increasingly seeing your own views reflected in the media and in society. For it is clear that transhumanism is an idea whose time has come.
_______________
Postscript
(September, 2001)
This article was first published in 1998. Since then things have developed, both technologically (of course) but also philosophically. I want to say just a few words about the main changes in my own thinking that have occurred over the past years.
1. When the first version was written, the main challenge was to make people aware of potential developments that the article discusses. That has been happening increasingly. Although there is still a long way to go, the focus for me has shifted to getting into the details, taking more account of the obstacles and downsides, and trying to develop a more sensitive treatment of the complex issues involved.
2. Many people are scared by transhumanism. While some of the fear is based on misconceptions, a significant part of it reflects a legitimate concern that in the process of pursuing technological “improvements”, we could risk losing some of the things that we regard as most valuable. The challenge, therefore, is to be sensitive to our fundamental values and to find a vision and a roadmap that will not lead to their disappearance but rather their enhancement (albeit, perhaps, in a transposed form). We must emphasize that what we should strive for is not technology instead of humanity, but technology forhumanity.
3. In addition to the somewhat intangible risk that we create a “utopia” where we have forgotten to include the things we care about most, there are various concrete risks of technology being used destructively, either by accident or malicious intent (consider e.g. the risks from nanotechnology referred to above). Planning to minimize these risks is a central concern.
4. A fundamental fact about us humans is that we care about how we relate to each other. Love, affection, envy, and friendships are such important parts of who and what we are that they cannot be left out of the equation. And there are no easy technological fixes to these issues. For example, maybe future technology could give you the illusion and the feeling of being loved. But maybe what you really want is to actually be loved – and not just by some custom-made lovebot, but by this currently existing human being that you have given your heart to. The best technology could do is to help you create the conditions under which your love could flourish and grow indefinitely, unencumbered by the erosive forces of current material and psychological conditions.
_______________
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I’m grateful to Anders Sandberg and David Pearce for comments on an earlier draft.

About Nick Bostrom
Dr. Nick Bostrom received his Ph.D. in philosophy from the London School of Economics in the year 2000. He is currently a Lecturer at the Department of Philosophy at Yale University. A founder of the World Transhumanist Association, he is the author of numerous publications in the foundations of probability theory, ethics, transhumanism, and philosophy of science, including the book Anthropic Bias: Observation Selection Effects in Science and Philosophy (Routledge, New York), which is due out in April 2002. For more information, see:

More: Nick Bostrom

More: Wikipedia on Outline_of_transhumanism

More: the-next-stage-in-our-evolution

transhuman1

Transhumanism: Evolving the Human Body I
Roberto Saracco

MzA4ODQ5NA-300x180

A cochlear implant based on optogenetics. Neurones in the cochlea are genetically modified to become sensitive to light. Using optical fibres a microchip converts sounds in light pulses that in turns stimulate the aural nerves with a very high precision. Image credit: Gottingen University
We have started to augment our body long long time ago, probably the first augmentation go back 170,000 years ago when our ancestors started to wear clothes to protect themselves from cold weather. You might not consider that an “augmentation” but it actually made possible to extend significantly the human habitat. It is also worth noticing the long time it took to the human race to achieve this first augmentation considering thatwe lost thermal insulation from hair (that our siblings, the chimpanzees still have) some 1 million years ago (based on genomic analyses). That is a quite long span of time to live completely naked!
Fast forward. At the end of the XIII century the first visual aid (sort of glasses) were invented (Northern Italy) providing another earlier case of human body augmentation.
In these last decades the variety of augmentation to our body made possible by technology has started to grow and we can expect a real explosion in the coming decades. These body augmentations can be classified in three areas:
external wearables for sensing and movement enhancement
internal implants in the body with special case for brain implants
biological augmentation based on genomics, genetics and reproductive
The three categories represent just a broad classification and there are a number of examples of augmentation based on technologies falling into more than one category. As an example, the implant developed by the University of Gottingen (see image) requires the genetic modification of cochlear nerves so that they can become sensitive to light. At this point a microchip can convert sounds (picked up through a micro microphone inserted in the ear duct of a deaf person) into light pulses. These are carried to the inner ear, where the cochlear nerve terminations are, by optical fibres. The light pulses stimulate the nerve terminations in a very precise way, not achievable with current technologies, and send the signals to the brain for processing. This device, so far tried on gerbils but soon to be tried on humans, can be seen as a way to restore hearing. At the same time it can provide augmentation both in hearing sounds that would be too weak to be detected by a normal ear and to detect sounds that are outside the frequency response of our hearing sense. As an example the microchip could be designed to provide hearing in the ultrasound range (like bats), which could be used to see in complete darkness like having a radar.
The microchip might also be designed to capture radio signals and convert them into sound patterns…
These are examples of augmentation that involve both biological modifications, wearable and implantable devices.
For an extensive discussion on the current status of augmentation implants you can look at the first Symbiotic Autonomous Systems White Paper. Updated information will be provided in the second White Paper due for publication in November 2018.
Discussion on human augmentation will also take place at the Workshop in conjunction with the Technology Time Machine conference in San Diego, October 30th through November 1st, 2018.

More: evolving-the-human-body

Transhumanism: Evolving the Human Body II
Roberto Saracco

EvolvingHumanb2-254x300
Application areas for human body augmentation. Source: Frost&Sullivan

Human augmentation is a form of evolution that our species has taken in its own hands and it is not going to be stopped. Eventually it might end up in the creation of a new species through bio-engineering that modifies the genome. We are still far from that although the main hurdles are more in the ethical and social domain than in the technological one (we do not have the knowledge to apply the technology we already have that would lead to a new species creation although we are already seeing work in this direction with the application of deep neural networks and more generally artificial intelligence to understand the connection between the genotype and the phenotype and as next step to design the genotype based on the desired phenotype).
Frost&Sullivan Visionary Innovation Group has listed a number of areas where human body augmentation will serve on the path towards transhumanism:

Increased Attractiveness
Enhanced Sensing
Sport optimisation
Digital biometrics
Ubiquitous and continual monitoring
Optimised diet
Enhanced strength
Disease free bodies
Extreme ageing
Enhanced Intelligence
Digital hardware enhancement
I have listed the various application areas according to my feeling of time occurrence, with the first one, Increased attractiveness, already happening and the last one not likely to happen anytime soon.
Of course, for each of these areas there are different degrees of fulfilment (ambition) and way of achieving them. As an example, we have plenty of plastic surgery being performed to increase attractiveness (curiously, may be a Freudian slip, I first typed Increase “attractivemess” which is something happening when plastic surgery goes too far….). In the future some genomic tweaking may result in the same increase of attractiveness without need of surgery. Like your offspring to be tall? A little genomic modification and there you have it! Likewise, one might claim that we already have some sort of “Enhanced Intelligence” through the use of tablets, smartphones to grab information from the web.
Let’s start discussing each area.
nanocos1
Use on nanotechnology in cosmetics is widespread with all major brand having adopted nanotech. Concerns on the potential side effects have not stopped their use so far. Image credit: BidnessEtc
Increased attractiveness
From as far as we can go back in time humankind has tried to enhance personal attractiveness, colouring (sometime scarring) the skin, elongating the neck, constraining the feet to remain small, increasing the muscle size and so on. Of course, attractiveness changes across cultures and what can be attractive here may be unpleasant there.
Cosmetics goes back several thousands years and technology has contributed significantly to cosmetics. Nanotech is now providing more options in cosmetics and electronics has also found way into cosmetics. Flexible electronics as well as on skin-printable electronics will provide means to create a novel line of skin jewels, sparkling skin in the real sense.
Plastic surgery is widespread and will get better with the availability of new materials. Smart materials will allow reshaping of body parts.
Genomic and bio-engineering are already supporting the selection of specific traits in In Vitro Fertilisation so that couple can choose the colour of the eyes of their baby…
These growing set of possibilities are opening up a set of social and ethical issues, including the gap between those who can afford this “un-natural selection” and those who cannot (choosing the sex of the future baby may cost over 15,000$). Of course, one could say that also in the past rich people could afford a life and choices that most other people could not…

More: evolving-the-human-body-ii

Transhumanism: Evolving the Human Body III
m_gdy001f3a-300x70

The capabilities of our senses are defining our perception of the world and the way we interact with it. In the image on the left a village scene, in the middle how the same scene would be perceived if we were to have a fly eye and on the right if we were to have a mollusk eye. Image credit: David Trippet

Roberto Saracco

2. Enhanced Sensing
A lot of research is ongoing to meet the needs of impaired people who lost completely or partially some of their sense capabilities, be it hearing, seeing, touching, smelling and tasting (the order reflects both the investment and the results obtained so far). Most of the results have shown that once we engage some artificial sense to replace or supplement an existing sense it becomes possible to extend the natural sense capabilities, this effectively augmenting the sensorial capacity of a person, to the point that an artificial sense might (in the future) become of interest also to people not suffering from any sense disability.
We are not at that point, yet. All artificial senses developed so far come short in terms of performance to replace with the same effectiveness natural senses but it is also clear that progress in technology will fill the gap and will push beyond the capability of natural senses.
One of the point that is emerging from research in this area is the flexibility of our brain, the real processing point of sensation, the one that gives meaning to the data provided by our senses (and often associates emotion to them). This flexibility is such that sometimes the brain can rewire itself to deal with signals conveyed by a sense as if they were conveyed by a different sense. It is the case of Neil Harbinsson, I discussed this in a previous post, that can see colours by hearing sounds…
Enhancing our senses would provide a different view/perception of the world and would likely set up a different set of interactions. This is nicely discussed in an article on Oxford Academic: “Music and the Transhuman ear: ultrasonics, material bodies and the limits of sensation“. It is a long article but if you are interested in these areas it makes for a good reading.
A lot of work is being done in the area of Augmented Reality and this will result in the availability of “interfaces” that will augment human vision and hearing. Notice that today we are talking about wearable based interfaces (like goggles) but in a few decades technology will have moved to the point of providing invisible interfaces, with direct connection to the sensory nerves and eventually to the brain (I don’t see this happening in the next 30 years -apart from some lab demos).
Once Augmented Reality will become seamless it will change forever our perception of the world and it might be one of the first turning point in the path towards transhumanism.
Prosthetic legs are becoming much more sophisticated to the point of providing a competitive advantage in competitions. Image credit: Newsweek

3. Sport optimisation

Unknown-300x150
Somehow related to Enhanced Sensing is the area of Sport optimisation, a way of reshaping the body to better fit the demand of a specific sport. It is related since it is involving sensing. The two single biggest hurdles in having functional prosthetics (for limbs, hands, …) is the powering of the prosthetic so that it can be active and its interface with the body. Providing accurate sensations is crucial to ensure a seamless integration with the body.
Most recent advances have seen the embedding of sensorial capability (touch) in prosthetics. An electronic skin is covering the prosthetics and can transmit sensations like touch, pressure and even pain.
The first Olympic for Cyborgs, people using prosthetics to participate to the context, was held in October 2016 in Zurich, Switzerland and a new edition is planned in 2020.
Paralympic athletes are showing performances that are getting closer to the one of normal athletes and it is expected that they will get an edge over normal bodies. Some discussion has already started on the fairness of using prosthetics in “normal” Olympics, showing the progress in this field.
Don Elgin, a paralympic pentathlete athlete is using different prosthetics depending on the game he is participating.
So far prosthetics have been used to recover from disabilities but it would not be surprising if they will be adopted in normal competition. If you think about it, professional skiers are using boots and skis that are ever moro sophisticate and that a providing a competitive advantage in the race. What about a skeet shooter donning a prosthetics to keep his arm still s she is aiming at the bull’s eye? Or a soccer player donning high tech shoes that will steer the ball in the exact spot at a kick penalty?
Clearly, as technology progress sport competitions will have to rethink their rules…

Roberto Saracco fell in love with technology and its implications long time ago. His background is in math and computer science. He’s currently the Chair of the Symbiotic Autonomous Systems Initiative of IEEE-FDC. Until April 2017 he led the EIT Digital Italian Node and up to September 2018 he was the Head of the EIT Digital Industrial Doctoral School. Previously, up to December 2011, he was the Director of the Telecom Italia Future Centre in Venice, looking at the interplay of technology evolution, economics and society. At the turn of the century he led a World Bank-Infodev project to stimulate entrepreneurship in Latin America. He is a senior member of IEEE where he leads the Industry Advisory Board within the Future Directions Committee. He teaches a Master course on Technology Forecasting and Market impact at the University of Trento. He has published over 100 papers in journals and magazines and 14 books. He writes a daily blog, http://sites.ieee.org/futuredirections/category/blog/, with commentary on innovation in various technology and market areas.

More: http://sites.ieee.org/futuredirections/2018/08/10/transhumanism-evolving-the-human-body-iii/
More:

Transhumanism: Evolving the Human Body VI

Transhumanism: Evolving the Human Body VII

Transhumanism: Evolving the Human Body VIII


http://sites.ieee.org/futuredirections/tag/augmented-humans/

More: http://sites.ieee.org/futuredirections/tag/transhumanism/

More:
Primo Post-Human: Trans-humanist Culture

Stages of Transhumanism
Transhumanism Beyond the Human Body

Outside the Body
-Smart Devices (Handy, Tablet, Laptop)

On the Body
-Continous Glucose Monitoring System

Part of the Body
-Prosthetics

In the Body
-Pacemaker